The Boundary Committee began its work in October of 2010 with a charge that outlined the work of the committee given the overcrowding at many schools.
The final recommendation was provided to the Board of Education in February of 2011 to increase class size at the 1st through 5th grade level by two students. Below is a summary of the impact of the recommendation:
| Grade |
Current Class Size Cap |
Boundary Committee Recommended Class Size Cap |
2011-12 Projected Class Size Average (based upon Boundary Committee Recommendation) |
| K |
20 |
20 |
18.2 |
| 1st |
20 |
22 |
20.5 |
| 2nd |
20 |
22 |
20.1 |
| 3rd |
24 |
26 |
23.4 |
| 4th |
24 |
26 |
23.9 |
| 5th |
24 |
26 |
23.5 |
As part of the recommendation, the following items were moved forward out of the committee for the Board’s consideration:
1. The Board should consider the addition of a mobile unit (two classrooms) at Lyon School
2. The Board should consider the addition of a mobile unit (two classrooms) at Hoffman School beginning in the 2012-13 school year
3. The Board should consider revisiting the capacity of each building on a yearly basis
4. The Board should consider revisiting the enrollment projections on a yearly basis
5. The Board should consider a study to determine at what enrollment figure each school becomes too large
6. If the recommendation is accepted, the Board should consider a complete analysis of the class size change to determine the impact on class size averages at each school
Note: the committee discussed that the Board should consider closely monitoring the diversity between the clusters but determined there is currently a committee looking at this issue (Dual Language Committee) and therefore stopped short of this consideration.
The presentation to the Board is available for review. (Must be opened in Adobe Acrobat, not Preview).
The Boundary Committee looked at ALL options related to space constraints, including:
* School attendance boundary shifts
* Adding additional space at existing schools (temporary or permanent)
* Moving District-wide programs from one building to another within the District or to off-site locations
* Increasing class size
DECEMBER 2, 2010 ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS
At its Dec. 2, 2010 meeting, the committee heard from RSP, the District's consultant, with research related to the current student attendance as well as projections for the future. The full presentation is available. (Please note: Since the maps are lower resolution as part of the presentation, they are linked below in a much higher resolution format for easier viewing.)
RSP shared they have spoken with school district administration, Village of Glenview officials and Cook County officials as part of their work.
The model they have utilized includes cohort change, external change, kindergarten change and the economy. Additionally, RSP has created planning areas that are defined by:
• By land use (residential, commercial, industrial)
• By residential density (single-family, mobile home, duplex, apartment)
• By natural features (rivers and creeks)
• By manmade features (railroad and roads)
RSP shared that analyzing demographic and development trend data is a key element in being able to understand what has, is, and will happen in the community.
Past and current enrollment information was shared, past and current annual grade change, and population and enrollment. It was noted that all enrollment numbers EXCLUDE preschool, early childhood, and special education students assigned to stand-alone classrooms. It is projected that 184 preschool, early childhood and special education students will be in the District over the next five years. View Projections.
RSP shared many maps and explained their significance to the projection process, including:
• In Migration- students attending grades 1-8 who were not attending the previous school year in grades K-7.
• Out Migration- students attending the previous year in grades K-7 who in the following year no longer attend in grades 1-8.
RSP reviewed the enrollment projections and indicated that the midpoint projections will be utilized for all planning efforts.
RSP shared the following conclusions:
• The district midpoint projection over the next five years forecasts a greater enrollment in 2015/16 than in 2010/11.
• There likely will be continued capacity issues at all the schools.
• While the district is for all practical purposed built out, the average age of households, females birthing age, and condition of housing inventory, will result in a stable to increasing enrollment.
• Large open areas are depicted for parkland, preserves, or golf courses- it is not anticipated that these areas will develop.
• All demographic trends point to an enrollment increases of approximately 300 students by 2015/16, the district will need to continue to plan for facility capacity
District Map
Elementary Attendance Areas
Middle School Attendance Areas
Planning Area Map
Planning Area Map - A Little Closer
Student Location Map
Student Enrollment Change Map
Student Density Map
2010 (0-5) Cohort Density
2010 Females (15-59) Density
2015 Females (15-59) Density
In-Migration Map
Out-Migration Map
OLPH Students
|