Recognizing the needs of each child and believing all children can learn, the mission of Glenview School District 34 is to empower children to be responsible learners and decision makers in a changing society.

Boundary Committee
Overview

The Boundary Committee began its work in October of 2010 with a charge that outlined the work of the committee given the overcrowding at many schools.

The final recommendation was provided to the Board of Education in February of 2011 to increase class size at the 1st through 5th grade level by two students. Below is a summary of the impact of the recommendation:

Grade Current Class Size Cap Boundary Committee Recommended Class Size Cap 2011-12 Projected Class Size Average (based upon Boundary Committee Recommendation)
K 20 20 18.2
1st 20 22 20.5
2nd 20 22 20.1
3rd 24 26 23.4
4th 24 26 23.9
5th 24 26 23.5

As part of the recommendation, the following items were moved forward out of the committee for the Board’s consideration:

1. The Board should consider the addition of a mobile unit (two classrooms) at Lyon School
2. The Board should consider the addition of a mobile unit (two classrooms) at Hoffman School beginning in the 2012-13 school year
3. The Board should consider revisiting the capacity of each building on a yearly basis
4. The Board should consider revisiting the enrollment projections on a yearly basis
5. The Board should consider a study to determine at what enrollment figure each school becomes too large
6. If the recommendation is accepted, the Board should consider a complete analysis of the class size change to determine the impact on class size averages at each school

Note: the committee discussed that the Board should consider closely monitoring the diversity between the clusters but determined there is currently a committee looking at this issue (Dual Language Committee) and therefore stopped short of this consideration.

The presentation to the Board is available for review. (Must be opened in Adobe Acrobat, not Preview).

The Boundary Committee looked at ALL options related to space constraints, including:
* School attendance boundary shifts
* Adding additional space at existing schools (temporary or permanent)
* Moving District-wide programs from one building to another within the District or to off-site locations
* Increasing class size

Meeting Minutes
Committee Members
Input, Feedback and Questions

DECEMBER 2, 2010 ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS

At its Dec. 2, 2010 meeting, the committee heard from RSP, the District's consultant, with research related to the current student attendance as well as projections for the future. The full presentation is available. (Please note: Since the maps are lower resolution as part of the presentation, they are linked below in a much higher resolution format for easier viewing.)

RSP shared they have spoken with school district administration, Village of Glenview officials and Cook County officials as part of their work.

The model they have utilized includes cohort change, external change, kindergarten change and the economy. Additionally, RSP has created planning areas that are defined by:
• By land use (residential, commercial, industrial)
• By residential density (single-family, mobile home, duplex, apartment)
• By natural features (rivers and creeks)
• By manmade features (railroad and roads)

RSP shared that analyzing demographic and development trend data is a key element in being able to understand what has, is, and will happen in the community.

Past and current enrollment information was shared, past and current annual grade change, and population and enrollment. It was noted that all enrollment numbers EXCLUDE preschool, early childhood, and special education students assigned to stand-alone classrooms. It is projected that 184 preschool, early childhood and special education students will be in the District over the next five years. View Projections.

RSP shared many maps and explained their significance to the projection process, including:
• In Migration- students attending grades 1-8 who were not attending the previous school year in grades K-7.
• Out Migration- students attending the previous year in grades K-7 who in the following year no longer attend in grades 1-8.

RSP reviewed the enrollment projections and indicated that the midpoint projections will be utilized for all planning efforts.

RSP shared the following conclusions:
• The district midpoint projection over the next five years forecasts a greater enrollment in 2015/16 than in 2010/11.
• There likely will be continued capacity issues at all the schools.
• While the district is for all practical purposed built out, the average age of households, females birthing age, and condition of housing inventory, will result in a stable to increasing enrollment.
• Large open areas are depicted for parkland, preserves, or golf courses- it is not anticipated that these areas will develop.
• All demographic trends point to an enrollment increases of approximately 300 students by 2015/16, the district will need to continue to plan for facility capacity

District Map
Elementary Attendance Areas
Middle School Attendance Areas
Planning Area Map
Planning Area Map - A Little Closer
Student Location Map
Student Enrollment Change Map
Student Density Map
2010 (0-5) Cohort Density
2010 Females (15-59) Density
2015 Females (15-59) Density
In-Migration Map
Out-Migration Map
OLPH Students

DECEMBER/JANUARY SURVEY RESULTS

In late December 2010 and early January 2011, the Boundary Committee asked parents and community members to provide their feedback on the options the committee was considering as part of its work. Results are avaialble.

JANUARY 26 AND 27 COMMUNITY INPUT SESSIONS

On January 26 and 27, the Boundary Committee hosted input sessions to provide the community an opportunity to ask questions and provide feedback about the concepts the committee was considering.

View the presentation. (Must be opened in Adobe Acrobat, not Preview)

FEBRUARY 10 MEETING - REVIEW OF INPUT AND PRESENTATION OF DRAFT CONCEPTS 4A AND 4B

The Boundary Committee met on Thursday, Feb. 10, and discussed the comments/questions shared at the recent input sessions related to two draft concepts (titled Concept 1 and Concept 3) designed to address the space constraints in the District. Additionally, the committee reviewed two different draft approaches around Concept 4 (titled Concept 4A and Concept 4B), which were not available prior to the January input sessions.

The committee will conclude their discussion and evaluation of draft Concepts 1, 3, 4A and 4B at its Thursday, Feb. 17 meeting and determine at that time what concept or concepts will be selected for presentation to the Board of Education. (Should Concept 4A or 4B be included, a second community input session will be scheduled – see below).

The February 17th meeting is the final meeting of the committee and will be at 6:30 p.m. at the Administration Building. All committee meetings are open to the public. At that meeting, the plan is for the committee to come to consensus around which concept(s) should be moved forward for consideration by the Board of Education. The Boundary Committee will present its findings to the Board on Monday, February 28. The Board is scheduled to make a decision at its Monday, March 7 meeting.

Since the community had an opportunity to provide comments and questions on Concept 1 and Concept 3 during the input sessions, if either Concept 4A or Concept 4B moves forward by consensus of the committee, an input session will be held. That feedback will be shared directly with the Board of Education. If neither of these concepts are considered acceptable by the committee, there would be no need for community input since they would have been eliminated from consideration (like Concept 2 was eliminated by the committee earlier).

The community should be aware that NO final decisions have been made. The committee is still considering the pros and cons of each concept. During its Feb. 17 meeting, further discussion of all concepts by the committee will be held prior to a final consensus decision on which concept(s) will be moved forward for Board of Education consideration.

All concepts are currently available for review in their draft forms:

Concept 1

Concept 3

Concept 4A

Concept 4B

Meeting Dates and Minutes

Meetings are open for the public to attend and listen to the discussion. All meetings (except where otherwise noted) begin at 6:30 p.m. and take place at the Administration Building, 1401 Greenwood Road. The schedule of meetings is listed below. Minutes are posted following approval by the committee.
Oct. 14 (minutes)
Oct. 28 (minutes)
Nov. 11 (minutes)
Dec. 2 (minutes)
Dec. 16 (minutes)
Jan. 13 (minutes)
Jan. 25 (minutes)
Jan. 26 - Community Input Session - Attea Middle School at 7 p.m. (view presentation)
Jan. 27 - Community Input Session - Springman Middle School at 9:15 a.m. (view presentation)
Feb. 10 (minutes)
Feb. 17 (minutes)
Feb. 28 - Board of Education Presentation - 7 p.m. (view presentation) - Must be opened in Adobe Acrobat, not Preview

Committee Members
The committee includes the following individuals:
Kathryn Baumgartner - Teacher
Brett Clark (Co-Chair) - Administration
Madeline Collins - Teacher
Kevin Dorken - Principal
Samantha Eisman - Teacher
Cathy Freidinger - Parent
Colleen Heilwagen - Teacher
Gerald Hill - Administration
Lori Hinton - Principal
Kandy Houser - Parent
Stewart Jester - Parent
Susan Johns - Parent
Eric Klaes - Administration
Ally Krueger - Teacher
Bob Lanzerotti - Administration
Jennifer Moe - Parent
Mike Nicholson - Administration
Chris Northwick - BOE
Mary Patronik (Co-Chair) - Parent
Adriana Pauletto - Parent
Heather Phillips - Parent
Alisha Potter - Teacher
Katie Siegel - Community Member
Ivy Sukenik - Principal
Kaki Voss - Parent
Input, Feedback and Questions

Anyone interested in providing input, a comment or a question, can complete the form below:

  * Required fields are in bold
Your Name:
Your Address:
Your Phone Number:
Your E-mail:
Current School(s) of Children:
Comment/Question: